September 22, 2009

Q&A: Deed-in-Lieu Dilemna

Q: My wife and I are behind on our first mortgage. The lender has sent us paperwork which says they are willing to consider taking the house back and would like to ask for a deed in lieu of foreclosure. My question is: what would happen to our second mortgage?

A: This is a question which a lot of people who are struggling with their mortgage payments need to consider.

First, the lender will make a decision as to whether or not they will ACCEPT a deed-in lieu (which allows voluntarily relinquishing the house instead of foreclosing on you) based on whether or not you have a second. Most often, when there is a second mortgage involved, they will decline accepting the deed-in-lieu because their claim to ownership of the property would be encumbered by your second. Essentially, they can say, we don’t want your troubles. This is especially likely to be the case if you took out the second during the past few years and paid off credit card and other debt. In such a case, not only did you convert consumer, unsecured debt, into secured, mortgage debt but you also created a scenario where the investor who is actually carrying the risk on your home does not want to be held responsible for the portion of liability which they did not insure.

Why the lender might still choose foreclosure

Let’s discuss the second thing. Most states’ legal process will allow the 1st mortgage holder to be relieved of any responsibility for the second lien holder’s loss IF THE FIRST FORECLOSES. This caveat means your lender may decide, purely as a business decision, that foreclosure against you is their best option.

As a practical matter, even when a lender has sent you paperwork or indicated that a deed-in-lieu might be an option or you decided to request such resolution to your problem, there is no automatic RIGHT to do this. You will still be required to complete an extensive hardship package to determine whether or not you qualify for the ‘option to give back your house’. In addition to the difficulties tied to having a second loan the lender is required to be sure that you have exhausted all efforts and resources to try to meet your obligation to them.

Deed-in Lieu Warning

While the process is very simple (signing and notarizing a single page document) there are significant risks associated with your future LIABILITY if you do not have an attorney to both prepare the deed-in-lieu document and facilitate a transfer of the property.

Specific risks:
  1. Documents never reaching the lender
  2. Lender’s failure to record the transfer of the deed in a timely fashion (or ever)
    (becoming very common and a major problem for you if it happens)
  3. Possible insurance liability if something happens on the property while
    it is still in your name (Nasty possibility)
  4. On-going bills for maintenance or citations from the local health and
    hospital board for health hazards, weeds, etc
  5. On-going on home owners’ association dues which could be very costly.
Deed-in-lieu is a slightly better option than foreclosure but should be handled with care and the professional services of an attorney who will address the risks I mentioned above.

FOREWARNED is FOREARMED.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

No comments:

Post a Comment