Q&A: Strategic Default

Strategic Default

Q. My house is worth considerably less than what my mortgage payoff is currently. My husband and I are still working and can manage the payment but it just does not make sense to keep making a payment every month when we are so upside down. I have heard the phrase ‘strategic default’ which seems to mean the people just decided to walk away and leave the house. Is this something we should consider?

A. The issue of strategic default has not been addressed in this blog at all until it was mentioned recently in the jingle mail blog. First, let’s get some clarity about what is being called a strategic default. As the phrase is being used currently it most often refers to someone who:

1. Has the financial means to keep making the mortgage payment
2. Has determined that the balance is significantly higher than the value of the property to the point that no turnaround is likely in the foreseeable future
3. Has been unsuccessful in getting the lender to renegotiate for a reduced principal balance
4. Has consciously made the decision to forgo additional mortgage payments and let the chips fall where they may (including the most likely outcome being foreclosure)

Now that I have provided clarity on when it might be considered, I will answer that question you asked, which is, should you consider it. My answer is that ONLY you can decide if you are willing to accept the consequences which are likely to occur as a result of a strategic default. I would not presume to try to move you one way nor the other. I will give you a glimpse of possible consequences to help you in the decision.

Possible consequences include:

1. Foreclosure—very likely—almost a given
2. Deficiency judgment—depends on your state foreclosure laws, highly likely where permitted
3. Additional expenses incurred due to vandalism to the property after you abandon and before the lender/guarantor puts the property into their name. Scary thought if they never do. (or if it is six months or a year from now and the value of the home has continued to decrease.)
4. Lender or Guarantor may be successful in going after assets you have to satisfy the deficiency mentioned above
5. Negative impact on the possibility of a future home purchase (kind of like a separation, you left but you can’t marry anybody else until you get the divorce)
6. Possible liability should someone be injured or killed on the property while you are still the title holder and the party responsible for insurance (even though you have not paid it)
7. Possible tax liability for the shortage, once that has been determined
8. I could mention a few more but you get the picture

While there is the compulsion to walk away from this really, really difficult situation you need to weigh the pros and cons carefully...then ask yourself...what is the worst thing that can happen?

Can you live with that, whatever that is? If you can, then move forward knowing that you considered the options and made an informed decision. Best of luck, whatever you decide.

"Remember, knowledge can be empowering!"

Mildred