Showing posts sorted by relevance for query title coverage. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query title coverage. Sort by date Show all posts

September 7, 2009

WORD: Closing Protection Coverage

And the WORD for Today Is:

Closing Protection Coverage – is a well-kept secret which relates to a closing on a local real estate transaction. Unlike the title policy which pertains to the title of the property, closing protection coverage pertains to the handling of the funds and documents by the closing agent. Closing protection coverage covers losses due to the mishandling of funds or documents by the authorized closing agent. If a borrower chooses to purchase closing protection coverage, then they have coverage against loss of settlement funds resulting from any of the following acts of the licensed agent or anyone acting on behalf of the licensed agent, subject to restrictions or exclusions identified in the coverage:
  1. Theft fraud, misappropriation or any other failure to properly disburse settlement, closing or escrow funds;

  2. Failure to comply with any applicable written closing instructions, when agreed to by the licensed agent. (See closing agent).
You must be specifically named in the closing protection coverage form in order to be protected. A copy of this form is available to you, upon request.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

October 3, 2009

WORD: Marketable Title

And the WORD for Today is...

Marketable Title – means a title that can be readily sold to a reasonably prudent purchaser aware of the facts and their legal meaning concerning liens and encumbrances. Marketable does not mean the same as CLEAR title. Many bank-owned properties are sold with the use of a marketable title (which is disclosed) but if the buyer does not understand the risks associated with such a purchase and does not conduct a title search there could be unpleasant consequences.

Marketable Title means a title which can be readily marketed but may not have all liens cleared. A buyer should therefore be aware of their legal rights and secure additional protection with a title policy which provides gap coverage.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased atwww.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

August 13, 2009

REO Assumptions and Assertions

REO Assumptions and Assertions

Biggest Assumption: They just need to dump it

Translation: They’ll take any kind of crazy offer

Assertion: N-O-T YET

As a former Fannie Mae Broker–Specialist, I can provide insight into the real world of buying and selling bank-owned properties. First, forget most of what you think you know about such transactions—you’re probably way off target.

The Devil’s in the Details . . .

If you’re assuming they just need to dump it, you are half way right. They do, they really do, but not at any price. The most common misconception is that the holder of REO property will accept any offer without consideration for the value of the collateral. I suspect you’ve been watching too much late night television. While it is true that the increased volume of foreclosed properties means a substantial increase in REO inventory, the basic business principles which govern liquidation are not changing as rapidly as they need to (or as you had hoped they would.)

Harsh New Reality

It is a harsh new reality that today’s market is being flooded with REO’s. Thousands more will be added in the months ahead as a result of the backlog which has been created because of political posturing. As a consequence, both federal agencies (HUD, VA, Fannie and Freddie) and private mortgage insurance carriers will need to adjust their guidelines during the upcoming months. Unfortunately, as a practical matter, in the meantime, they and loan servicers must operate within the guidelines of existing regulations and existing contractual stipulations until they are amended. They will be relaxed—necessity will dictate that they must be. The consequence will be a ‘let’s make a deal free-for-all.’ Good for agents and buyers—not so good for price stabilization. But it has to happen and the sooner we get to it the better.

They Don’t Know Its Value

You’re right on target with that assertion. The “local market reality” is a piece of data which is hard for the servicer to grasp when they handle properties around the country from a centralized location. The truth is, their usual resources are less than reliable. They must rely on:
  • Their appraisal, and we know how likely that is to be inflated
  • A $50-$75 BPO—okay, does anyone really think you’re getting an accurate evaluation with a product produced in a BPO mill? Do you really think that they are trying to determine value with that document? (They are NOT. They are fulfilling a servicing requirement to have a BPO performed.)
  • Their gut instinct
  • The loan amount shown in their computer—but since when has that been connected to the ACTUAL value of the property?
Hence, the market will dictate and that process takes time. If the property is ‘rejected by the market’ for an extended period of time then it is declining in both actual and perceived value. It’s in everyone’s best interest to determine fairly accurately, from the onset, what is today’s market value. Consequently, the servicer needs a current, as-is appraisal. While many appraisers were rewarded for inflating values during the boom years, they are now stuck with the unpleasant task of trying to justify vast differences between former and current value. Market correction is not enough of an explanation but the recently sold comps don’t lie. It’s worth what someone will pay for it—today—not last year.

The Law of Supply and Demand

In time (I think within the next three to four months) the inventory will be so high that the valuations will plummet and get in line with what a ready and able buyer is willing to pay a reluctant REO owner. During the boom years hundreds of thousands of houses were built across the country without any clear need based on population growth. Speculation in real estate was HOT. The jobs created, the loans generated, and false illusion of prosperity made for wonderful headlines.

I was nearly thrown out of a Foreclosure Task Force meeting in Indiana in 2006 when I dared to mention the need for a moratorium on new construction since the city had already built more than 30,000 new homes in 5 years for only 10,000 new residents. I mentioned a college business class on supply and demand. I visited Denver in 2006 and thought they were building homes for the entire United States to move there. Then I moved to Florida and quickly observed that enough new houses were being built there for the few folks who didn’t want to move to Denver or Indianapolis. Shall I mention Atlanta, Las Vegas and twenty other cities which issued building permits without checking to see where the buyers were coming from. We are paying the piper (and we will be paying for the next ten years) for allowing an excessive amount of housing to be built. We created an economic situation which will dictate FEWER aggregate occupied households as people move to sharing homes in order to survive the financial crisis created, in part, by the ‘creative financing’ used to sell the new housing stock.

In time, the newly created rental housing market (previous homeowners, now renting again) will absorb much of the current excess single family housing but we will have changed the dynamics of communities across the countries from single family, owner-occupant to rental dwellings, perhaps housing more than one family. Investors are the most likely purchasers for the glut of foreclosed homes which will hit the market during the next two years. As businessmen and women, they will make decisions based on totally different criteria than buyers who would be owner-occupants. Financial institutions will have no choice except to reconsider their options when holding costs, fines from municipalities and other constraints dictate they do something to stop the bleeding. Excess has its payback. The law of supply and demand will not be ignored; pretending it does not exist is a sure fire way to pay the piper.

Now About that Insurance and Title Work

If you do not know the difference between a ‘marketable title’ and a ‘clear title’ this would be an excellent thing for you to research if you are planning to purchase an REO property. Suffice it to say that the REO you are purchasing can have gaps in the title coverage which leave room for undisclosed liens to surface after the closing and bite the new owner in the proverbial behind. Since you will have signed numerous documents which stated that you understood that you had no recourse after closing: you will not be surprised when I tell you: YOU HAVE NO RECOURSE AFTER CLOSING.

Watch for an upcoming webinar on the HOM website: “Buying REO is Risky Business”. You might want to put that on your schedule.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

October 22, 2009

Q&A: Flood Insurance

Q. We closed on a house more than two months ago and just received a letter from the lender telling us we have to have flood insurance on the property. Shouldn’t the title company have done a survey and determined whether or not flood insurance was needed BEFORE they allowed us to close? How can they force us to take on this extra expense now?

A. It would be highly unlikely that a title company would close without a survey which stipulated whether or not the property was in a flood zone, therefore requiring flood insurance. The closing also should have included a “flood insurance certification” which would have declared that all parties were aware that no flood insurance was required.

However, mistakes do happen occasionally. It might have been missed or it might reflect a change in the flood map or very likely it means there was a situation where part of the neighborhood is in a flood zone and part of it is not. Your home might have ‘appeared’ to be exempt from the flood insurance requirement when, in fact, it was required.

Commitment to Cooperate

In the event there had been a recent change in the flood zone maps (or they just plain made a mistake) which means the property must be covered with flood insurance you no doubt signed a document at closing which states you would cooperate with all parties (Lender, title company or REALTORS®) if they needed you to help them with correcting forms, etc from closing.

Compliance Disclosure

Almost all closings also include a document which states you specifically agree to add flood coverage IF it becomes a requirement AFTER you have closed. Lenders have the right to have the collateral protected from risks such as floods and therefore the stipulation that flood insurance can be added , when deemed necessary.

I’m afraid you must continue the coverage. Flood insurance is pretty expensive and I know that can cut a good sized hole in your budget when you were not expecting it. But the real beneficiaries—You and Your Family.

Better to have it and not need it, then to need it and not have it.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

June 6, 2009

WORD: "General" Warranty Deed

And the WORD for Today is:

“General” Warranty Deed—provides the broadest coverage for the purchaser. It conveys the property to the new buyer but the guarantor is also warranting that he is entitled to the property as well as guaranteeing against any defects in title or outstanding encumbrances on the title. In cases where there is later found to be a cloud on the title, in whole or in part, the guarantor of a general warranty deed will satisfy a claim with a cash award if there is a loss. The ALTA 98 title policy is the insurance which makes that guarantee to the new purchaser.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

February 7, 2009

Myth #3

Myth #3: That bank-owned property is always free of any undisclosed liens or other encumbrances.

Reality: Many of the homes being purchased as REO or bank-owned properties are being transferred with liens already attached or the possibility of liens becoming attached.

Reason: The kind of title policy which is used for REO sales is a special, limited coverage policy. The holder of REO properties makes no warranties about possible clouds on the title prior to their acquisition through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu. Title is transferred using a special warranty deed or a sheriff’s deed and most importantly all the documents which the purchaser has signed states that they understand these facts.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)