Q&A: Smoke & Mirrors

Q. I am extremely frustrated trying to getting my lender to work with me on getting a modification of my loan. I have already received notice that they have started foreclosure but I have also received a couple of letters which says they are willing to work with me on trying to keep my home. The problem is that the letters I have received do not have a name so I don’t know who to speak to. Every time I call I get a different person who gives me different instructions on what I need to do. Why don’t they provide a name so I can talk to the same individual and get something worked out?

A. The problem you are experiencing is a common one. It is amazing that lenders/servicers who claim to be doing everything they can to work with borrowers can’t provide a name for a contact or REAL numbers so you are not going through a series of numbers and extensions which frequently lead you nowhere. Most folks would assume if you got an unsigned letter that the sender was not serious about having you reach them.

Lenders and Servicers are under a great deal of pressure:

a. Pressure from the GUARANTOR who will ultimately absorb any loss via an insurance claim after an acquisition (foreclosure or deed-in-lieu)

b. Pressure from the government (whether or not they received TARP funds) to try to avoid foreclosures

c. Pressure from any investor who has purchased the underlying mortgage to collect and forward payments on a monthly basis, in a timely manner (or cover them themselves)

d. Pressure created by the INHERENT CONFLICT because the lender/bank needs to look out for their own best interest which is NOT best served by a lengthy loan workout and the guarantor whose BEST interest is not served by an acquisition. Essentially, the lender and their servicing partner have the responsibility for looking out for the guarantor which conflicts with their personal best interest. It’s kind of like a kid who has to appear to be compliant with a parent’s instructions since blatant defiance is totally unacceptable. S-o-o-o-o, you get surface compliance but lack of depth and sincerity. So consumers get telephone numbers which deadend nowhere and letters which say reach out and call me, but fail to say who sent them.

SMOKE & MIRRORS

There is the strong possibility that the failure to make it easy be in touch and get clarity for a workout could be a smokescreen. IF there is a foreclosure, the lender/bank closes the file and submits a claim for the amount of the shortage. End of their pain.

The behavior of SOME borrowers has become the anticipated response from all borrowers. As a consequence, practices at the servicer centers tend to demonstrate, by and large, an expectation that the home is going to foreclosure so why should they waste time and effort on genuine workout attempts.

If they work at doing a workout there is the aggravation of trying to work with a defaulted borrower who might not be totally committed to the process and either does not understand or for other reasons does not provide all the materials requested or does not do so in a timely fashion. Dragging the pre-foreclosure period out for months WHILE THE INVESTOR IS DEMANDING MONTHLY PAYMENTS can be a drag on the lender’s bottom line.

Consumers play into this mentality by not doing ALL that they can do to comply but the larger responsibility falls on the lender/servicer as the LEADER and PACESETTER for a workout to be completed. The lender/servicers could start by having a person’s name in the signature box of a letter saying call me, I can help.

IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Reflections on the Home Affordable Loan Modification Program

The Obama Administration announced the H A M P program with great fanfare on March 4, 2009. It was a bold step to address the foreclosure problem which was clearly swirling out of control. $75 Billion committed to reducing loan payments. Projected to help more than 4 million homeowners.

It Began With a Premise

Foreclosures in the country were occurring at break neck speed and something had to be done. The plan was conceived based on the premise that homeowners would pay their mortgages—IF they could. Despite being upside-down, borrowers are committed to retaining their home. Warren Buffet has been quoted as saying “Commentary on the current housing crises often ignores the crucial fact that most foreclosures do not occur because a house is worth less than it’s mortgage (upside down). Rather, foreclosure takes place because borrowers can’t pay the monthly payment they agreed to pay.” It is a premise with which I agree and an honorable premise on which to craft a resolution.

A Look At the Program

H A M P or Home Affordable Loan Modification Program was launched with the specific and ambitious goal of making sure that millions of Americans would have the opportunity to remain in their homes even though market dynamics and other factors beyond their control meant the value of the property had declined AND they were struggling with payments but they wanted to keep their home. The goals were clear, the mandate receiving strong support. It seemed a good thing—for all the right reasons.

Reduction in Payment

To address the ‘ability to pay’ the H A M P plan provided guidelines for getting those payments under control. Conservative banking guidelines for many years had shown that mortgage payments at no more than 31% of a borrower’s income usually prove to be sustainable so that OLD underwriting guideline was used as a benchmark for what should be the new goal to help us get out of this mess.

To accomplish this, lenders and their servicing partners were provided with guidelines to make this happen:

a. First, Reduce the payment amount so that it was no more than 31% of the borrower’s monthly income

b. Reduce the interest rate to as low as 2% as a way to get the payment down farther

c. Extend the term of the loan—up to 40 years—further reducing the monthly payment

d. If the payment amount was still more than 31% of the borrower’s monthly income, THEN funds from the H A M P fund would be used to pay whatever was needed to get the payment down to 31% of monthly income

Adjusting the principle balance was not an option addressed by this plan even though it was a logical step (in the opinion of this writer) and had been the objective of the ‘cram down’ component of the bankruptcy reform legislation defeated late in 2008.

Criteria for Participation

H A M P was created as an option for owner-occupied properties with outstanding balances of $729,750 or less. The homeowner was required to demonstrate a hardship caused by a factor or factors beyond their control. It applied to loans originated prior to January 1, 2009. Modified payments were set up for 3 months, as a test to see if the borrower could afford the new payment.

If they made that threshold, then the loan modification became permanent (for 5 years, so let’s say, semi-permanent).

Investors or speculators were exempted from participations. So if you had bought into the hype that building a piece of America was the way to financial security, you were on your own. Consequently, it was expected by a number of observers that the number of foreclosures in this segment would rise dramatically, and RISE they have.

Incentives

In order to facilitate this voluntary program, the H A M P initiative provided for financial inducement to all parties to participate. Servicers (and/or the lenders whom they represented) were to receive $1,000 for each completed modification. The plan called for an additional $1,000 for each year the modification remained in place with a cap after 3 years. The borrower could get $1,000 off their principal balance for each year, up to five years.

“Net Present Value” Test

In order to determine which loans should be modified, lenders/servicers were to conduct a ‘net present value’ test. The test was supposed to compare the expected cash flow which would be generated under the program (with a modified, performing loan) as compared with the expected cash flow if the loan were not modified (and continued non-performing if the borrower were already in default). Let’s see, some $ paid, versus $0 paid. Not a hard test really. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

Good intentions for a worthy cause. So how did it go wrong. Why have consumers across the country been yelling fowl by the hundreds of thousands? Why has the Administration acknowledged that the program has not reached nearly the scope that they projected? We’ll provide those assessments in tomorrow’s blog. Don’t miss it.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

FYI: Fannie Mae Confirms Short Sale Commissions Policy

Thought this might be helpful to some of you:

Fannie Mae Confirms Short Sale Commissions Policy.

In discussions between NAR and Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae has reconfirmed its short sale commission policy and established a process for REALTORS® to follow if issues arise. On February 24, 2009, Fannie Mae sent Announcement 09-03 to its servicers instructing them not to negotiate commissions on short sales below the amount negotiated by the listing agent, unless the commission exceeds 6 percent. The Announcement reminded servicers that third party approvals (i.e., private mortgage insurers) may be required and can affect commissions. In response to concerns raised by NAR that some servicers of Fannie Mae loans are unaware of this policy or believe it is not binding, Fannie Mae has established a process for NAR members when short sale commission issues arise.

Step 1: Determine whether the loan is owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae. Only the holder of the loan is allowed to do this, so do so in the presence of your client or after obtaining their written permission. Use this website: www.fanniemae.com/loanlookup, or If you don’t have convenient internet access, call: 1-800-7FANNIE (8am to 9pm Eastern Time)

Step 2: If the servicer is unaware of or disagrees with the policy, provide a copy of Announcement 09-03 to the servicer and negotiate an appropriate commission based on the listing agreement (up to 6 percent).

Step 3: Contact Fannie Mae if the dispute is not resolved directly with the servicer. Be prepared to provide the property address, name of owner, and Fannie Mae loan number (if available):

Call: 1-800-7FANNIE (8am to 9pm Eastern Time), or

Email: Resource_center@FannieMae.com.

Fannie Mae Announcement 09-03 (2/24/09)

https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/annltrs/pdf/2009/0903.pdf

National Association of REALTORS® Government Affairs Division
500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington DC, 20001

REALTOR® is a registered collective membership mark which may be used only by real estate
professionals who are members of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
and subscribe to its strict Code of Ethics

REO Assumptions and Assertions

REO Assumptions and Assertions

Biggest Assumption: They just need to dump it

Translation: They’ll take any kind of crazy offer

Assertion: N-O-T YET

As a former Fannie Mae Broker–Specialist, I can provide insight into the real world of buying and selling bank-owned properties. First, forget most of what you think you know about such transactions—you’re probably way off target.

The Devil’s in the Details . . .

If you’re assuming they just need to dump it, you are half way right. They do, they really do, but not at any price. The most common misconception is that the holder of REO property will accept any offer without consideration for the value of the collateral. I suspect you’ve been watching too much late night television. While it is true that the increased volume of foreclosed properties means a substantial increase in REO inventory, the basic business principles which govern liquidation are not changing as rapidly as they need to (or as you had hoped they would.)

Harsh New Reality

It is a harsh new reality that today’s market is being flooded with REO’s. Thousands more will be added in the months ahead as a result of the backlog which has been created because of political posturing. As a consequence, both federal agencies (HUD, VA, Fannie and Freddie) and private mortgage insurance carriers will need to adjust their guidelines during the upcoming months. Unfortunately, as a practical matter, in the meantime, they and loan servicers must operate within the guidelines of existing regulations and existing contractual stipulations until they are amended. They will be relaxed—necessity will dictate that they must be. The consequence will be a ‘let’s make a deal free-for-all.’ Good for agents and buyers—not so good for price stabilization. But it has to happen and the sooner we get to it the better.

They Don’t Know Its Value

You’re right on target with that assertion. The “local market reality” is a piece of data which is hard for the servicer to grasp when they handle properties around the country from a centralized location. The truth is, their usual resources are less than reliable. They must rely on:

• Their appraisal, and we know how likely that is to be inflated
• A $50-$75 BPO—okay, does anyone really think you’re getting an accurate evaluation with a product produced in a BPO mill? Do you really think that they are trying to determine value with that document? (They are NOT. They are fulfilling a servicing requirement to have a BPO performed.)
• Their gut instinct
• The loan amount shown in their computer—but since when has that been connected to the ACTUAL value of the property?

Hence, the market will dictate and that process takes time. If the property is ‘rejected by the market’ for an extended period of time then it is declining in both actual and perceived value. It’s in everyone’s best interest to determine fairly accurately, from the onset, what is today’s market value. Consequently, the servicer needs a current, as-is appraisal. While many appraisers were rewarded for inflating values during the boom years, they are now stuck with the unpleasant task of trying to justify vast differences between former and current value. Market correction is not enough of an explanation but the recently sold comps don’t lie. It’s worth what someone will pay for it—today—not last year.

The Law of Supply and Demand

In time (I think within the next three to four months) the inventory will be so high that the valuations will plummet and get in line with what a ready and able buyer is willing to pay a reluctant REO owner. During the boom years hundreds of thousands of houses were built across the country without any clear need based on population growth. Speculation in real estate was HOT. The jobs created, the loans generated, and false illusion of prosperity made for wonderful headlines.

I was nearly thrown out of a Foreclosure Task Force meeting in Indiana in 2006 when I dared to mention the need for a moratorium on new construction since the city had already built more than 30,000 new homes in 5 years for only 10,000 new residents. I mentioned a college business class on supply and demand. I visited Denver in 2006 and thought they were building homes for the entire United States to move there. Then I moved to Florida and quickly observed that enough new houses were being built there for the few folks who didn’t want to move to Denver or Indianapolis. Shall I mention Atlanta, Las Vegas and twenty other cities which issued building permits without checking to see where the buyers were coming from. We are paying the piper (and we will be paying for the next ten years) for allowing an excessive amount of housing to be built. We created an economic situation which will dictate FEWER aggregate occupied households as people move to sharing homes in order to survive the financial crisis created, in part, by the ‘creative financing’ used to sell the new housing stock.

In time, the newly created rental housing market (previous homeowners, now renting again) will absorb much of the current excess single family housing but we will have changed the dynamics of communities across the countries from single family, owner-occupant to rental dwellings, perhaps housing more than one family. Investors are the most likely purchasers for the glut of foreclosed homes which will hit the market during the next two years. As businessmen and women, they will make decisions based on totally different criteria than buyers who would be owner-occupants. Financial institutions will have no choice except to reconsider their options when holding costs, fines from municipalities and other constraints dictate they do something to stop the bleeding. Excess has its payback. The law of supply and demand will not be ignored; pretending it does not exist is a sure fire way to pay the piper.

Now About that Insurance and Title Work

If you do not know the difference between a ‘marketable title’ and a ‘clear title’ this would be an excellent thing for you to research if you are planning to purchase an REO property. Suffice it to say that the REO you are purchasing can have gaps in the title coverage which leave room for undisclosed liens to surface after the closing and bite the new owner in the proverbial behind. Since you will have signed numerous documents which stated that you understood that you had no recourse after closing: you will not be surprised when I tell you: YOU HAVE NO RECOURSE AFTER CLOSING.

Watch for an upcoming webinar on the HOM website: “Buying REO is Risky Business”. You might want to put that on your schedule.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

Community Service Announcement: Modification Warnings

Community Service Announcement: Modification Warnings

There is a lot of positive which can be said of getting your loan modified and the mortgage payment changed to one which is more affordable. But you would be wise to consider some new twists which may mean it is not as great a bargain as you thought.

Temporary or Permanent Change

Back in the olden days—just a few months ago—loan modifications were made by lenders for distressed borrowers who had demonstrated the ability to resume payments and sustain them as permanent changes to the existing mortgage. The modification was processed as a PERMANENT change in the loan terms so the borrower could rest assured that the new loan was, in fact, one which could work for them. Many of the new modifications are only TEMPORARY. The trial period may be as short as 3 months or as long as six months. This is being used as a new test period to see whether or not you are able to sustain the payment. The problem is that there is no ironclad guarantee that the ‘modified’ loan payment will remain in place after that introductory period.

Life Happens

What happens if your loan is transferred to another servicer during your trial period? Worse yet, suppose your financial institution is sold or otherwise acquired by someone else? In either case, you would be holding an unenforceable, short-term agreement with a party different than the one you actually have to deal with concerning payments. You would be wise to consult with an attorney about the terms of ANY modification being proposed by your lender or to have an attorney to help you with structuring a modification which is practical given your current situation and the value of the property.

Temptation Could be too Strong …

Under the current administration’s plan to encourage lenders to modify as many loans as possible, lenders/servicers are being paid a fee to process those modifications. Substantial fees. They are paid based on whether or not they get the modification completed. They are paid whether it is an agreement which works for you or not. They are paid whether or not you have received what is called “net tangible benefit” (did it do you any good?).

We would hate to think that a bank might process modifications in order to receive payment even when they were aware that the payment amount was not sustainable for the borrower, but remember these are the same institutions which processed loans for some folks who clearly were not in a position to make those payments either. I’m just saying....

Has the modification been recorded?

One might argue that there is no point in recording a short term agreement and you could see their point. But maybe the reason for processing short term or temporary modifications was to avoid recording them in the first place. If there is NO RECORD officially—as in your local city’s Recorder’s Office—of the newly created Modified loan then the only record which exists is the OLD, unaffordable loan. IF your loan is transferred or sold, then the OLD loan is the current loan which is the ONLY loan that exists. Surely you can see where I am going with this.

Recommendation: If your loan has been modified and you want to keep that payment then it MUST be recorded.

HINT: Insist that your modification agreement contain a provision for the loan to be recorded promptly after agreement is finalized by your and your lender/servicer. Otherwise, you could be in for some heartburn.


Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Did You Know: Loan Screw-ups

FYI—Loan Screw-ups

It is important that you know some of the ways the servicer of your loan frequently fails in their responsibility to handle their job as they should. Their failure could give you the reason you need to block a pending foreclosure. There are many things they do wrong or fail to do at all but the more common items include:

• Failing to make timely payments from your escrow account
• Failure to aggressively work at a loss mitigation attempt when requested to do so
• Sending you inconsistent letters demanding payment
• Failing to honor forbearance agreement (not you—them)
• Failing to give you proper notice of a servicing transfer and your rights related to that transfer
• Failing to properly apply payments during the transfer period, possibly creating a default
• Failing to provide a timely or complete response to a qualified written request
• Choosing to apply force-placed insurance when you, in fact, already had coverage in place
• Returning mortgage payments
• Improperly placing your payment in a suspense account
• Posting your payment late and/or misapplying your payment
• Threatening foreclosure when, in fact, you are not delinquent
• Charging excessive fees for the use of attorneys, inspections, etc
• Charging fees for services which have not YET been performed
• Creating a default by misapplication of the payments you have sent in

This is just a partial list of things which servicers do on a regular basis which can wreck havoc with your loan. At the least, it can be an inconvenience. At the worst, it can actually cause you to be in default and in foreclosure through no real fault of your own. It happens. Even when you have actually missed mortgage payments and are struggling to keep your home, the loan servicer is still required to handle the account with certain fairly standard and reasonable guidelines. Too often, they fail to do so and you end up getting the short end of the stick. Unless consumers demand they stop the unfair practices and produce documentation of how they have handled your file (via a qualified written request) they will continue to operate like they all got training in the wild, wild west where anything was okay.

What should you do if you suspect your servicer is not dealing with you fairly?

Step One: File a qualified written request following guidelines discussed elsewhere on this blog. (Do additional research on the web; see this entry on Buying TIME from our blog).
Step Two: Try to find an attorney who will represent you in challenging their right to foreclosure.

You must move quickly and with a firm action plan so that you don’t become another foreclosure because the consumer didn’t know that they could fight back.

The “Buying TIME” Foreclosure First Aid Kit, available at www.DovePublishingHouse.com would be of great benefit to you as well.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Q&A: Real Party of Interest

Q. I had been making payments for more than a year to Company X and fell behind on my mortgage payments by a couple of months. Today I got what looks like a foreclosure notice from a company I have never heard of before. The amount they say I owe is wrong and they are claiming that I have not made payments for the past 8 months. I don’t want to lose my home over some mistake but I can’t afford an attorney. Is there some way that I can figure out how to keep my home on my own?

A. There is a strong possibility that you may be able to block the foreclosure long enough to figure out what is going on. Your first step is to file an “answer” (see here) to all the correct parties.

Let’s cover some basics about the “real party of interest.” The real party of interest is the only entity or individual who can be the plaintiff in a lawsuit. Concerning your mortgage or deed of trust, the real party must either have purchased or otherwise have acquired legal ownership of the collateral in order to sue you as a plaintiff for non-payment of the debt. There is also a provision for a servicer who has been granted servicing rights “with assigns” to be the named plaintiff as well, since such a arrangement grants all rights to the holder as though they were the rightful owner. “Servicing rights only” does NOT grant one the power to sue for payment as a plaintiff in a foreclosure action.

In all cases, the named plaintiff should be able to provide documentation that they have the legal right to pursue you for payment. Send a qualified written request and demand that they provide such documentation. The documentation you need is a copy of the transfer of your note/deed of trust. Or proof that a transfer of servicing rights “with assigns” was made prior to the filing of the foreclosure. With so many lenders making transfers of files all the time, they have gotten really sloppy about these little details. Many times servicers are identified as plaintiffs in a foreclosure action when they have no legal right to do so. Challenge the validity of the action, not the truthfulness of your default. Additionally, dispute the amount declared to be in default and request documentation of all funds paid by you on the account.

Essentially I am saying that many foreclosures are processed and completed, folks lose their homes when the lawsuit was filed by someone who was not, in fact, the “real party of interest.” A consumer borrowed money from Bank X, who transferred the loan to Bank Y, who was then bought by Bank Z. Bank Z owned Bank Y, but your note is still held by Bank Y. Bank Z cannot legally be the plaintiff until there is a transfer of your SPECIFIC note to Bank Z.

It’s a simple concept once you think about it. Use an attorney if you don’t feel competent doing it yourself; but I think you could handle this yourself once you fully understand.

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved. "Answer Book in a Foreclosure Climate" by Mildred Wilkins, available in 2009 from www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

From the Desk of..."Is the Sky Really Falling?"

Feels like the sky is falling …

Well, maybe that was a piece of the sky you just hit in the middle of the road. Just be glad you are a REALTOR… everyone knows real estate agents don’t have a retirement account to worry about so you haven’t lost anything with the market going crazy. Or have you? I suspect that upon closer examination you’ll discover that, in fact, you’ve lost a great deal. No, the sky isn’t really falling but a few stars are missing. Have you heard of Fannie, Freddie, AIG and Nehman? Life will be different, but different does NOT necessarily mean doomed.

My Sky is Fine

We’re happy for you. Jealous (and suspicious) but grudgingly happy. It’s true that real estate is a local market. Consequently, there are isolated pockets around the country which have not been hard hit with the broad economic issues and the housing meltdown. We all await a return to the time—only two years ago (seems like twenty)—when the sky was up there where the sky is suppose to be and not falling on our heads in chunks. If you’ll excuse me, I think that was another star I saw fall up ahead.

Had a CLOSING lately?

You know, those events where people sign papers at the end of a real estate transaction and everybody leaves the room happy, including two REALTORS with checks in their hot little hands. You haven’t? It’s probably because some tight-fisted lender changed the rules at the last minute and did not approve the buyer after all. Or maybe the buyer’s money from the 401-K which they had planned to use for a down payment just evaporated. E-V-A-P-O-R-A-T-E-D, I tell you. Or the retiree clients you were so excited to get because they actually have CASH are now too scared to move in case their dwindling retirement account keeps shrinking. Or maybe the last honest appraiser in your town came back with an honest valuation so far below the agreed purchase price that everybody freaked. (It could happen). Needless to say, CLOSINGS are becoming a reason to pop a cork and declare a special holiday.

What’s a REALTOR to do?

A good starting place would be to read the article “REALTORS at a Crossroads”. If you missed it, send a quick email to: HomeOwnershipMatters@gmail.com to request a copy.

This is an excellent time to critically analyze whether real estate sales (or real estate period) is what you need to embrace as a career, at this time. Taking stock is always appropriate. Making changes requires self-awareness, recognition of shifts in your personal needs, changes in market dynamics and the courage to create a new road map. The major difference between an enthusiastic adventure into the future and devastating fear is whether you walked---or got pushed. Let’s assume you wish to be the master of your fate. Read on. . .

Guidelines for becoming an EXPERT

If you’ve decided to make a change, then aim high. Do your research, know your competition, make a business plan. Yes, even you folks who have been in business since Jesus was a baby. Experts build on their natural skills and experience, plus education . I encourage you to plan too become the in leader in your chosen arena, in your area. There is no better time than now to use your down time to create a vision for a successful future.

Resources to get you there

You can do it; these will help.

• dsnews.com (that’s default servicing news)—This is the trade magazine for lenders and servicers. (sign up for their FREE online newsletter)
• NeighborWorks America—nti.org (that’s National Training Institute) You specifically need to take their 3 day loan servicing class.
• Home Ownership Matters Training Institute—the source for this news article and (FIS) Foreclosure Intervention Specialist training and other specialized courses
• National Consumer Law Center—resource for invaluable materials and classes related predatory lending, bankruptcy and other legal options to challenge foreclosure
• Center for Responsible Lending—terrific resources on lawsuits and challenges to existing practices associated with lending which frequently increase the chances of default
• “Your Real Estate Advisor”—a real estate resource which will help you to understand the terms, laws and forms which are most frequently used in the practice of real estate. This educational book is written in easy to understand language so you’ll be able to apply the valuable knowledge it provides. It is available at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

The Sun Will Shine Again. . .

It always does. Life guarantees death and taxes. It creates for us unlimited possibilities wrapped up in opportunities. Even the exodus of agents from the business ushers in the opportunity for those remaining to work at differentiating themselves, excelling in their chosen arena and succeeding. The choice remains yours. The tools are available. Today’s consumers need real estate professionals who are experts at what they do. There is a great need for agents who have the ability to educate consumers about the various choices related to their home, especially if the borrower is in default. The ability to facilitate implementation of difficult transactions is, likewise, more urgently needed today than ever before.

Are you prepared for the challenge?

Observations From the Desk of Mildred Wilkins,
President and Founder of Home Ownership Matters, LLC.

© Copyright 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights reserved.
(FIS) is a registered trademark of Home Ownership Matters, LLC.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Did You Know? Guidelines for Loss Mitigation

Guidelines for Loss Mitigation

FYI—Guidelines for the loss mitigation options which are available on government backed loans are public information—available on the internet. Whether you have an FHA, VA, USDA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan, the regulations which determine what options are available and the factors which need to be considered for each are hidden in plain sight—on the web.

I’m telling you they are there—I am not saying they are easy to find or easy to understand. Nor am I saying that lenders/servicers abide by them even half the time. Do the research, get some clarity and figure out what YOU think will work for you.

The most important thing is to know that they exist and where to find them.

FHA loans: We recommend Mortgagee Letters 00-05 and 08-43 (Click here to go to a page with a listing of HUD's mortgagee letters.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

Q&A: Foreclosure Workout "Trickeration"

Q: I was behind on my mortgage and did all the right things, contacted my lender, gave them all the information they requested and cooperated with arrangements for a workout. When they finally set an amount for a repayment plan not only was the monthly payment 1½ times my regular payment but they also required an initial payment of $3,000 (I am behind by 8K). Why would they demand I agree to an arrangement that obviously my current income cannot support? This makes no sense to me.

A: The sad answer is that it is what my urban friend in Indianapolis calls “trickeration”. Trickeration is a nasty little concept where I appear, on the surface to, to being looking out for your best interests, working with you with you in a spirit of mutual respect and cooperation, while in reality I am “tricking’ you into some kind of agreement or arrangement which not only totally benefits me but I get you to agree so you can’t later say I didn’t work with you. Nor can you say it was my fault because you agreed.

Lenders/Servicers will be angry at this answer, it is nonetheless the truth. Many of the workouts which they propose and/or implement either:

1. were not based on the financial reality of the borrower at the time they were implemented, or
2. the lender/servicer demonstrated a lack of good faith and was not genuinely committed to a sustainable workout, or
3. frequently there is a deliberate attempt to set the borrower up to fail in the workout SO THE LENDER CAN THEN MOVE FORWARD WITH FORECLOSURE. Unsustainable workouts are frequently just another step in the ritual leading up to foreclosure, and/or
4. may simply be a smokescreen so the lender can assure the mortgage insurer (the ultimate risk holder) that, YES, we do have a workout in place on this loan. YES, we did our best to avoid foreclosure. Too bad you, the sucker, can’t keep up with the arrangement which you were forced to agree to.

Workouts which do not have a snowball’s chance are common practice. There is no point of you signing one IF you recognize that it is not feasible. Recommendation: try to speak with a supervisor about the terms being proposed. You will be better prepared to argue for a REALISTIC workout if you have done your homework, know what loss mitigation options are available and then cooperate fully and sincerely to reach a sustainable solution to your delinquency. Best of luck.

© Copyright Home Ownership Matters, LLC, 2009 “Answer Book in a Foreclosure Climate” by Mildred Wilkins.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback and comments, and especially your questions!)