Showing posts sorted by relevance for query title agent. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query title agent. Sort by date Show all posts

April 18, 2009

Q&A: Signing Documents

Q. Signing Documents

My wife and I purchased a home a month ago and we have not felt good about the whole deal from the time we left the closing. The lender we used had told us that we would have to pay points to get the rate down so we could afford the payment and we agreed to that. The problem is that when we got to the closing, the amount they had on the loan documents was a lot higher than what we had been told earlier by our lender. The title company said there was nothing they could do about it and that we just had to sign the papers? Is that true? We felt trapped, had all our stuff packed and felt we had no choice except to go ahead. Now we are not so sure. Did we make a mistake and if so, what can we do about it now?

A. The answers to your questions, in the order in which you asked them are: No. No. Yes and Probably not much.

Let’s talk about your problem which, unfortunately, happens all the time to folks. I will address first this specific situation and then the general problem of papers which don’t match up to what you had been led to believe would be included.

It is the responsibility of a title company to handle all the details of the closing in accordance with state law and in compliance with the details in the contract signed by the seller and the buyer. In addition, the title company is obligated to accept instructions from the lender for many details associated with the closing. Those details include what forms should be in the closing package what amounts should be inserted in all the documents related to money, etc. SO, when the title company said there was nothing they can do, what they meant was, “There is nothing we can do UNLESS the bank gives us some other instructions.”

When you are closing a real estate transaction the title company is the facilitator for that transaction. For a large percentage of closings, the title company has no relationship with either party and is simply being paid to process the paper work and assure that it is a transaction which was properly and legally handled. But there are times when the title company is, in fact, an agent for a party to the transaction. This is called dual agency. This means they are working for one specific party to the deal. This is most common if you are buying a new construction home and the title company is the company picked by the builder (sometimes owned by the builder) to handle all their transactions.

In addition, if the home you are buying is a bank-owned home, then the title company is, in fact, working for the owner of the foreclosed property (whether that is a lender, servicer or insurer/investor). SO, when the title company said there was nothing they could do, what they meant was “There is nothing we can change UNLESS we get different instructions from our principal (the lender/servicer/insurer).

Did you make a mistake? I have to tell you that you did. It probably doesn’t make you feel a lot better to know that almost everyone makes the same mistake.

THE MISTAKE: Believing that because someone presented you with papers that you must sign them. You DO NOT have to sign them. No, you can not go ahead with the transaction unless you sign them, but that also means that the other people can’t get what they want either. If you insist that the papers have to be changed to what you were told before (especially if you have a good faith estimate which documents the amounts you should be paying) then there is a very strong chance that the lender will change their instructions to the title company, the papers will be changed accordingly and then all of you can re-convene in order to close the deal.

This is almost certainly not going to happen this afternoon. But it can happen. It is worth holding out for. It is worth making everyone else uncomfortable until you get the deal you were told you would be getting.

Is there anything you can do now? I doubt it because you signed all the papers. You used your most prized possession and endorsed yourself into a pickle. You can hold on to the lesson you learned, share it with others and promise yourself to never again sign documents which you don’t clearly understand or which do not correspond to the agreement with the other party.

JUST DON’T DO IT!

© Copyright 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved. "Answer Book in a Foreclosure Climate" by Mildred Wilkins, available in 2009 from www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

September 7, 2009

WORD: Closing Protection Coverage

And the WORD for Today Is:

Closing Protection Coverage – is a well-kept secret which relates to a closing on a local real estate transaction. Unlike the title policy which pertains to the title of the property, closing protection coverage pertains to the handling of the funds and documents by the closing agent. Closing protection coverage covers losses due to the mishandling of funds or documents by the authorized closing agent. If a borrower chooses to purchase closing protection coverage, then they have coverage against loss of settlement funds resulting from any of the following acts of the licensed agent or anyone acting on behalf of the licensed agent, subject to restrictions or exclusions identified in the coverage:
  1. Theft fraud, misappropriation or any other failure to properly disburse settlement, closing or escrow funds;

  2. Failure to comply with any applicable written closing instructions, when agreed to by the licensed agent. (See closing agent).
You must be specifically named in the closing protection coverage form in order to be protected. A copy of this form is available to you, upon request.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

March 20, 2010

WORD: Dual Agency


And the WORD for Today is...

Dual Agency — means the representation of two parties (principals) who have opposing interests. Dual agency is legal in most states as long as both parties have been informed that the agent also represents the other party. In real estate, dual agency most often refers to an agent who represents both the buyer and seller in a transaction. Likewise, the escrow or title agent is also working for both parties and must be neutral. This author is philosophically opposed to dual agency except under very limited and special circumstances. While real estate professionals will argue that there is no problem as long as you stay neutral, staying neutral is, itself a problem from my viewpoint. I don’t want someone representing me to be neutral; I want you to be proactively working exclusively for my best interests. Dual agency does not provide for putting my interests above the interests of the opposing party. Consumers should seriously consider the value of separate representation even when dual agency seems simpler. You can’t legislate impartiality; most humans tend to side with one part or the other, even when legally obligated to “be fair”.

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

March 31, 2009

WORD: Dual Agency

And the WORD for Today is:

Dual Agency—the representation of two parties (principals) who have opposing interests. Dual agency is legal in most states as long as both parties have been informed that the agent also represents the other party. In real estate dual agency most often refers to an agent who represents both the buyer and seller in a transaction. Likewise, the escrow or title agent is also working for both parties and must be neutral. This author is philosophically opposed to dual agency except under very limited and special circumstances. While real estate professionals will argue that there is no problem as long as you stay neutral, staying neutral is, itself a problem from my viewpoint. I don’t want someone representing me to be neutral; I want you to be proactively working exclusively for my best interests. Dual agency does not provide for putting my interests above the interests of the opposing party. Consumers should seriously consider the value of separate representation even when dual agency seems simpler. You can’t legislate impartiality; most humans tend to side with one part or the other, even when legally obligated to “be fair”.

See yesterday's post for more information on dual agency.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

September 28, 2009

Q&A: Is the Seller Responsible for back taxes?

Q: When selling their home, is the seller responsible for paying the back taxes or tax liens?

A: Short answer: YES, to both.

Individual sellers of real estate are required to provide a clear chain of title and that requires that any back taxes or tax liens would have to be satisfied prior to or at the closing. In order to demonstrate that there are no outstanding debts against the property, the seller signs a vendor’s affidavit which affirms that there are no outstanding obligations which have not been paid. Additionally, they provide the purchaser with a general warranty deed further guaranteeing that a clear title has been conveyed.


Buyer Beware—Bank-owned sellers

The use of the word ‘their’ in the question above indicates you are talking about buying a home from an individual rather than an REO (bank-owned property) from an insurer such as HUD, VA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. While these insurers are required to pay back taxes and Federal tax liens before they transfer title, they are NOT required to cover all liens and consequently you will most often receive what is called a “special warranty deed”, “sheriff’s deed” or “trustee’s deed”. Irrespective of what it is called, any of these types of deeds will be transferring “marketable title” but not necessarily “clear title” to you. You owe it to yourself to get clarity on all the words highlighted in this section before you purchase a home which is being offered for sale by an institution rather than an individual.

Pass it on! your ‘contingency’ and move to a closing.

What are contingencies?

They are stumbling blocks which must be addressed before you can close on the new home purchase. It might be that you have a home you must sell first. It might be that you need to get money from a 401K and have not yet applied for that to be released. You might need to pay off some outstanding judgments in order to get final loan approval to complete this transaction. It could be that you are awaiting a final answer from your employer about a possible job transfer or any one (or ten) other things.

Most important is to discuss with your agent whether or not there are conditions in the content of your offer, (probably under further conditions) which grant the seller permission to continue to show the home. If there are NO contingencies then I would say the home should have been pended and no, there should be no further showings.

Real estate contracts are somewhat complex but you really can understand them if you take the time to understand what the words really mean. Read your specific contract and see what they can and cannot legally do until the closing actually occurs. Best of luck.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

May 19, 2009

Q&A: Promised Perks

Q.  I am not quite sure whether or not I have a legal problem but I think I got shafted and I want to know what to do about it. I recently bought a new house and the real estate agent promised me a cash rebate as well as a bonus from the builder if I purchased. I was supposed to receive these as soon as I closed. The rebate and bonus were not mentioned at the closing and now the agent refuses to talk to me. What should I do and how do I get the money I was promised?

A: Well, let’s see. You were promised a cash rebate and a bonus which appear to be outside the scope of the “official” or legal transaction since you did not receive the money as part of the closing on the home you purchased.

I am very carefully saying here that the promises made to you do not appear to be legal. Kickbacks seldom are. Trying to enforce an illegal promise could get a little dicey.

When you purchase a home (including new construction) the purpose of the lender’s appraisal is to be sure that:

a. The home is at least worth what they are about to loan you to acquire it.

b. That no amount in excess of the value of the home is being financed

For example, that you are not financing a house worth only $400,000 with a loan of, say $425,000 to allow enough money left from the lender’s funds to give you a kickback of $15,000 and a bonus of $10,000 (for furniture or a vacation or anything remotely like that). That is commonly called mortgage fraud.

The title company has a responsibility to be sure that there are no components of the closing which are in violation of the law. The title company can not be responsible for what the parties agreed to if it is not in the contract and not part of the closing instructions sent over from the lender. One of the requirements for a legal closing is that there be no “undisclosed” exchange of funds, such as kickbacks from the seller to entice you to buy.

All funds which are to exchange hands between any of the parties associated with the transaction are to be included on the HUD-1 document. It is against the law in most places for someone to pay you a rebate and a bonus to get you to buy the home they built. (I know the car companies did it, but look at them now. Apparently their guidelines are a bit more lax than real estate transactions and look at where it got them.)  

The HUD-1 is the official record of the transaction and anything which cannot appear on it usually is suspect.  In fact, fairly often during the last several years, what is on the HUD-1 frequently could stand a little more scrutiny.

I’m a grown-up so I know that what you described was not uncommon practice during the past 4-5 years in some of the hottest markets in the country. Wild construction growth, wild deals, wild foreclosures now. I am familiar with parking lot exchanges and promissory notes and gifts, rebates and bonuses which cannot appear on the HUD. Property values are falling in markets like California and Florida where I live like parachutes, in part, because one of the components of speculative building was to build in ‘extras’ such as the two things you asked about. The country is experiencing both a market correction to more realistic value for homes but also a major part of the problem was that the loans covered more than the piece of real estate, if you get my drift.

What should you do?  Enjoy your new home and try to keep up the payments. You got took!

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

May 24, 2009

FYI: Short Sale–Slow Crawl

What they DIDN’T tell you about short sale offers  

The man back at the bank has a few things to take care of before he can respond to the offer you just made to buy a home as a short sale. Did your REALTOR mention?

The Lender must:
  • Order an appraisal (could take awhile)
  • Order title work (won’t take long but has it been ordered)
  • Get a broker price opinion completed (hopefully the real estate agent knows what they are doing)
  • Check to be sure there are no unpaid homeowner’s association dues or municipal bills which must be paid (could add to what YOU have to pay)
  • Check to be sure that the SELLER qualifies for a short sale under the guidelines for the specific insurer for this property—at this time—since those guidelines are  changing pretty rapidly lately
  • Check all the details of the SELLER’s financials to be sure they have no assets or other reasons why a short sale cannot be approved (did they even send this stuff in yet)
  • Verify that there are no Federal liens which must be satisfied
  • Work out a deal with the SELLER’s second lien holder, if there is one
  • Check with the insurer on the home to be sure that the guidelines for accepting a short sale are being followed
  • Consider ANY/ALL offers which have been submitted on this home to be sure they respond to the one which will net the lender the most, after expenses (You did know they could consider other offers, right?)
  • Negotiate with the SELLER what will be done about the shortage (on certain loan types)
  • Review a preliminary HUD statement to be sure that the numbers which were provided by the LISTING agent on a net sheet are going to allow the lender to new what is required by their insurer or investor to close
  • Present a Counter Offer, to the buyer with the BEST, overall offer, if the preliminary HUD reflects that the net will be below the acceptable amount required
  • Must not allow a closing which not protect the interest of the insurer/investor
Somebody told you all this, right? If not, maybe your agent doesn’t understand short sales as well as they need to. Sure glad you found the information on this blog. Just a word of caution:  don’t sign a notice to vacate your current residence until AFTER you get a signed approval letter from the lender granting permission for a short sale. This could take a little while. 

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

December 14, 2009

...From the Desk of..."Are You Ready to Intervene?"



Twenty Questions for Today’s Real Estate Professional

I was recently asked by the Charleston Trident Board of REALTORS® to differentiate the (FIS) Foreclosure Intervention Specialist certification from other short sale certification programs. Please know that the Board has offered both the (SFR) (Short Sales and Foreclosure Certification) and the (LMC) (Loan Modification Certification) certifications which are excellent programs.

Both have been widely attended in Charleston and I strongly encourage you to sign up for one or both at the next opportunity. Every single licensee should avail themselves of a basic short sale class so they have a rudimentary understanding of this ‘new’ transaction which is dominating the market in many parts of the country.

(FIS) will be offered for the first time in South Carolina beginning March 2010, courtesy of a FPR (Foreclosure Prevention and Response) grant from NAR. I think the operative word of distinction is ‘basic’ as compared to ’comprehensive’. This 30 hour program is designed for the agent who has decided to commit to getting an in-depth understanding of the various facets of handling these intricate transactions—the relationship connection, the Law, the Ethics, property valuation, the process, the negotiating, getting to the closing table, the downside, the resources needed, community partnerships, the self-study to continue to grow and much, much more.

Why offer (FIS)? Because hundreds of students who had taken either the 4 or 8 hour basic short sale training classes offered by Home Ownership Matters beginning in 2003 demanded more. More time, more expansive, more details. The course evolved and in 2005, the (FIS) certification was introduced in Ohio. Since then (FIS) has been approved for CE credit in six (6) states and there are graduates from twelve (12) states. States approved for CE include: Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado and Oklahoma.

30 hours, 700+ pages of material.

Tried and true methodology coupled with sound philosophy
from a former Fannie Mae Broker-Specialist

Updated regularly and state specific (Law section)

I decided the easiest way to say what you’ll learn is to pose the questions which will be addressed.

Are you ready to intervene?

1. Do you know how to distinguish a ’frozen customer’ from a potential short sale client? Do you currently use an intake form to determine who is a viable candidate for this type transaction and who is just not prepared for the commitment? Can you screen OUT the 60% of folks whom you should not list as short sales?

2. Are you prepared to analyze/distinguish the many HATS which may be required to help someone who is in default: the social worker, medical counselor, marriage counselor, human resources helper, spiritual advisor, budget counselor, salesperson extraordinaire, valuation expert, etc.

Are you real clear on what role you can and/or should play? Are you connected to/familiar with the community resources to address those needs which are outside of your scope of expertise? Do you currently utilize a referral form for this purpose? Can you see the potential for a fair housing complaint (or other complaint) without some standardized referral policy/form?

3. Do you know how to ‘handle’ the law while avoiding the ‘practice of law’? Do you clearly understand that it is necessary to understand some components of the law (and be able to explain them to your client) as part of a short sale attempt or an REO purchase?

4. Do you understand the impact of the seller filing bankruptcy on a potential short sale? The increased likelihood of a deed-in-lieu? Do you currently discuss this at the onset with your customer since it could/should end your relationship if they file later?

5. Are you familiar with the new Treasury guidelines for short sale—other than the fact that the commission cannot be reduced below 6%? Have you studied the guidelines? Do you understand them?
6. Are you familiar with the foreclosure law in your state? Is it a judicial or non-judicial process? What difference does it make? The guidelines for service on a defaulted borrower? Familiar with what the customary forms are and what they look like? Are you aware that violation of state foreclosure law can work in a borrower’s favor to gain extra time which could be used to facilitate a short sale? Or a reverse mortgage?

7. Do you have the expertise to accurately determine the value of a property in today’s declining market? Are you familiar with the professional BPO which is used as the industry standard (fanniemaebpo.com)? Could you complete one and do you understand why it can be much more accurate than the more commonly used CMA or market analysis? Are you clear on why accurate property valuation, from the beginning, plays such a critical role in the success or failure of your short sale effort?

8. Do you feel you clearly understand the unique protocol for short sales, not to be confused with REO and traditional sales? Who signs what? When? Presentation of offers? To whom?

9. Have you figured out what to disclose? To whom? And when?
Are the guidelines set by your Broker consistent with both Federal and state requirements/prohibitions on disclosure? Are you clear on the Who? What? When? HOW?

10. Are you familiar with your Board and Broker’s position on:

a. Disclosure—Who? When? How?
b. Commission—Who? What? When? How?
c. Signing of offers/amendments/price reductions—Who? When?
d. Presentation of offers—To whom? When? Signatures? Why?
e. Multiple offers—that is a whole other 20 questions

11. Does your brokerage utilize a set of disclosure forms which have been customized for the use with short sale scenarios? Are you familiar with them? Do you understand the protection that you may gain from covering the special risks associated with short sale transactions? Are you interested?

12. Do you understand the tax implications for a borrower who has completed a short sale? Please don’t tell me that you thought they were off scot free because the short sale was approved. (They are not) Do you have a referral to a tax accountant?

13. Have you read your state’s Seller Disclosure Law? Have you studied the state disclosure form? Does it include a reference to “threatened or pending litigation“? Or perhaps “notices from any Government or quasi-governmental agency”? Any “challenge to the title”? Are you clear on why any/all of these could forestall a short sale approval and therefore need to be disclosed?

14. Do you have clarity on the impact of a foreclosure on your customer’s ability to purchase down the road? Was that part of your discussion about the reason to consider a short sale in the first place? Have you discussed operating ‘in good faith’ as vital to the ability to keep the house on the market?

15. Is there a 2nd (or 3rd) mortgage? Are there other potential liens against the home (home owners’ association, taxes, personal judgment) which must be dealt with? Got a plan for how you are going to handle those? Do you know where to start?

16. Do you clearly understand the role of the Guarantor and/or the investor in determining whether or not a specific short sale can be approved? For that matter, do you know that the Servicer is merely a go-between hired to facilitate the administration of the loan but is NOT a decision maker? Who is? How can you find them? What are THEIR guidelines? Are they the same from Guarantor to Guarantor? Available in public records?

17. Are you familiar with the Qualified Written Request—backed by Federal Law (RESPA, no less) and the impact it can have as a ‘tool’ in delaying the foreclosure process if well-prepared? Used effectively and in a timely manner, you can gain valuable time to complete the short sale. We’ll cover that.

18. Has your firm/Broker created a “hold harmless” document which covers the scenarios which you cannot be responsible for with the clear understanding from your client that you will have no liability? Since the risk of lawsuit is pretty high with this new type of transaction, getting some understanding of what should be included and why should be paramount, I would think.

19. Have you identified as an agent/brokerage/Broker those scenarios which will require you to end the relationship? Have you established a policy concerning the need for a unilateral (not mutual) release? Under what circumstances, with what notice?

Certainly advance disclosure would be required: I would recommend at the inception of the agency relationship. We cover in detail during (FIS) training what I call the “Divorce Decree”. What happens if the client abandons? Files Bk? Enters into a deed-in-lieu? Refuses showings? Fails to cooperate in other ways? Policies should drive practices and both help to minimize liability.

Proper training and thorough understanding on each of these issues is paramount in order for you to be both effective at processing a short sale from beginning to end AND avoid the various opportunities to get yourself or your client into serious trouble along the way.

Short sales are the new reality for many markets around the country. They have become a major part of the market (along with REO’s) and becoming intimately familiar with how to process them successfully is paramount for any agent who wishes to thrive in today’s market.

If you do not already have clarity on ALL the issues which have been addressed in this article, then you are a prime candidate for the (FIS) certification program. Each of these will be explored and addressed during this 30 hour training program. You will leave with clarity on every single point covered here and will have the expertise to feel confident that you are representing your client with strong tools which have prepared you to be successful in getting the result you hope for and they deserve. YOUR knowledge base is a key component of your professionalism. Your success as a REALTOR® is tied directly to the caliber of your information.

Don’t miss an opportunity to learn, explore and interact with one of leading instructors on this timely topic. Her experience actually doing short sales, her time with Fannie Mae as a Broker-Specialist and expansive training (HUD, Fannie Mae, NeighborWorks, Legal Services, and National Consumer Law Center) can be invaluable to you.

Sign up today! Coming soon to a classroom near you!

Final Question

Is there someone in your office to whom you can refer a customer who needs short sale help? Within your firm? Maybe you can/should become that ‘Referral agent’ if you do not have the expertise today.

Are you Ready to Intervene????

*(FIS) is a registered trademark of Home Ownership Matters, LLC.

Other Foreclosure Resources

3. www.HomeOwnershipMatters.com — Calendar and Foreclosure/Loss Mitigation sections
4. www.nti.org — NeighborWorks America — Training Institute
5. www.consumerlaw.org — National Consumer Law Center


Mildred Wilkins
President of Home Ownership Matters
Author of “Your Real Estate Advisor”
Toll-free 1 (866) 507-5105

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

May 13, 2009

Q&A: Earnest Money

Q.  I recently encountered a problem while trying to purchase a house and I am not sure how to proceed at this point. I did not CHANGE my mind about the purchase; instead my bank refused to make the loan at the last minute after providing me with a pre-approval earlier. Now the seller is refusing to release my earnest money deposit of $2,500. I cannot afford to walk away from that much money. Can he legally do this? What are my next steps in trying to get my money back?


A: The release of a deposit from escrow can be a little dicey, but let’s talk about it. Your question specifically asks whether it is legal for the seller to refuse to release your earnest money deposit.

Technically, when money is held in escrow the holder of the escrow (Broker of the Listing firm, an attorney who is managing the escrow account or occasionally a title company) is who would release the money. They are prohibited from doing so until either:
  • There is a closing and the funds are distributed as part of the closing
  • There is a mutual release signed by both the buyer and the seller agreeing to all conditions of the release, or
  • A court which has jurisdiction over this matter determines who is entitled to funds
Ordinarily, a purchase agreement would have outlined the terms and conditions under which you would be entitled to receive your deposit. Most often, if you are denied financing, you would be allowed to receive the deposit in full from the escrow company. However, in order to be sure that both parties are in agreement and that no one is going to sue anyone else about the release of the money, both buyer and seller would need to sign a mutual release. Usually this is a one page document which basically says, things didn’t work out for whatever the specific reason happens to be and everyone agrees to go home and nobody’s going to sue anybody. The release also allows for negotiating how the earnest money will be split. It may be:
  • Returned to the buyer (for some reason beyond their control, like lack of funding)
  • Retained by the seller as liquidated damages (because you caused them some expense)
  • Shared in some manner (say 50% to buyer and 50% to seller)
I would recommend that you approach (or that your agent approach) the listing Broker to discuss the merits of your request to have the funds returned to you. Be prepared to demonstrate the failure to get funding by providing a letter from your lender which states as much. Remain civil and approach them in the spirit of goodwill. If you believe that it would be fair to do so, then compromise and offer to split the earnest money as I suggested above sometimes happens.

As a last resort, consider the possibility of filing a claim in small claims court where you would be allowed to present your evidence as to why you should receive the funds back. In that case, the judge would decide who gets the money. 

If it is any comfort to you, neither you nor the seller can get it until there is either a mutual release or a court disposition. Something’s gotta give!

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)