Q&A: Is the Seller Responsible for back taxes?

Q: When selling their home, is the seller responsible for paying the back taxes or tax liens?

A: Short answer: YES, to both.

Individual sellers of real estate are required to provide a clear chain of title and that requires that any back taxes or tax liens would have to be satisfied prior to or at the closing. In order to demonstrate that there are no outstanding debts against the property, the seller signs a vendor’s affidavit which affirms that there are no outstanding obligations which have not been paid. Additionally, they provide the purchaser with a general warranty deed further guaranteeing that a clear title has been conveyed.

Buyer Beware—Bank-owned sellers

The use of the word ‘their’ in the question above indicates you are talking about buying a home from an individual rather than an REO (bank-owned property) from an insurer such as HUD, VA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. While these insurers are required to pay back taxes and Federal tax liens before they transfer title, they are NOT required to cover all liens and consequently you will most often receive what is called a “special warranty deed”, “sheriff’s deed” or “trustee’s deed”. Irrespective of what it is called, any of these types of deeds will be transferring “marketable title” but not necessarily “clear title” to you. You owe it to yourself to get clarity on all the words highlighted in this section before you purchase a home which is being offered for sale by an institution rather than an individual.

Pass it on! your ‘contingency’ and move to a closing.

What are contingencies?

They are stumbling blocks which must be addressed before you can close on the new home purchase. It might be that you have a home you must sell first. It might be that you need to get money from a 401K and have not yet applied for that to be released. You might need to pay off some outstanding judgments in order to get final loan approval to complete this transaction. It could be that you are awaiting a final answer from your employer about a possible job transfer or any one (or ten) other things.

Most important is to discuss with your agent whether or not there are conditions in the content of your offer, (probably under further conditions) which grant the seller permission to continue to show the home. If there are NO contingencies then I would say the home should have been pended and no, there should be no further showings.

Real estate contracts are somewhat complex but you really can understand them if you take the time to understand what the words really mean. Read your specific contract and see what they can and cannot legally do until the closing actually occurs. Best of luck.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Myth—“As is” means inspection is unnecessary

MYTH: One of those myths which will not seem to die is that there is no need to have a home inspection on a property which is being sold “as is” since the seller has already indicated they are not going to repair anything. Failure to get an ASHI certified home inspector to thoroughly evaluate the home you are about to put down hard cash for is by far one of the riskiest things you can do when dealing with real estate.

REASON: You can’t judge a book by its cover (or a house by a walk-thru) 

The need for an inspection has been recognized by laws in almost all the states which grant the buyer the right to have an inspection and further to have certain types of issues addressed (to their satisfaction) or they have the right to walk away, retain their earnest money and go on about their business to find something more acceptable. 

In today’s climate with so many homes being offered for short sale it is increasingly likely that a traditional seller will offer a home for sale ”as is” because they have no money to provide repairs in the event an inspection shows there are items which need repair. 

Additionally, the market is currently flooded with bank-owned homes (REO’s which have been acquired via foreclosure or deed-in-lieu.) In either case the home has been vacant for an extended period of time, almost certainly without utilities on, and likely with delayed maintenance prior to the borrower losing it. Mold you see is definitely an issue: mold which has not yet manifested itself should cause you greater concern. There are so many major problems which can lie dormant in a long vacated home that you couldn’t give me one, much less convince me to buy it, even at a deep discount. (I rented a very nice, expensive Florida home which had been vacant for 3 years; I could tell you stories). To buy such a property without the benefit of a home inspection is foolhardy. If your REALTOR doesn’t advise you to have one, you need to 

start looking cross-eyed at the person you have trusted to advise you in your housing matters.

REALITY: A side benefit of an inspection is to know what repairs you want to ask the seller to take care of as a condition of moving ahead with the transaction. The core purpose of a home inspection is to determine what is the actual condition of the property (structurally, mechanically, etc) in order to determine if you wish to buy it: whether repairs are made or not. You may find a problem which is so expensive to repair or cannot be fixed to your satisfaction no matter what is done, which could cause you to decide to walk away from the transaction. As a real estate salesperson I had a couple walk away from a home after the home inspection found major termite damage as well as an active infestation of termites which we had not seen during our tour of the home. It could have been fixed but they were not certain that they would ever feel quite right about the integrity of the kitchen floor when so much of it (and the support beams) had been eaten away by the little varmints.

An inspection is for your peace of mind about the quality and condition of the home you are acquiring. It matters not whether it is being sold ‘as is’ or otherwise. You still need to know you’re not paying for a ‘pig in a poke’. Get the toughest inspection company you can find and ask for their TOUGHEST inspector. 

Good luck with your purchase.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Q&A: Signing Documents

Q. Signing Documents

My wife and I purchased a home a month ago and we have not felt good about the whole deal from the time we left the closing. The lender we used had told us that we would have to pay points to get the rate down so we could afford the payment and we agreed to that. The problem is that when we got to the closing, the amount they had on the loan documents was a lot higher than what we had been told earlier by our lender. The title company said there was nothing they could do about it and that we just had to sign the papers? Is that true? We felt trapped, had all our stuff packed and felt we had no choice except to go ahead. Now we are not so sure. Did we make a mistake and if so, what can we do about it now?

A. The answers to your questions, in the order in which you asked them are: No. No. Yes and Probably not much.

Let’s talk about your problem which, unfortunately, happens all the time to folks. I will address first this specific situation and then the general problem of papers which don’t match up to what you had been led to believe would be included.

It is the responsibility of a title company to handle all the details of the closing in accordance with state law and in compliance with the details in the contract signed by the seller and the buyer. In addition, the title company is obligated to accept instructions from the lender for many details associated with the closing. Those details include what forms should be in the closing package what amounts should be inserted in all the documents related to money, etc. SO, when the title company said there was nothing they can do, what they meant was, “There is nothing we can do UNLESS the bank gives us some other instructions.”

When you are closing a real estate transaction the title company is the facilitator for that transaction. For a large percentage of closings, the title company has no relationship with either party and is simply being paid to process the paper work and assure that it is a transaction which was properly and legally handled. But there are times when the title company is, in fact, an agent for a party to the transaction. This is called dual agency. This means they are working for one specific party to the deal. This is most common if you are buying a new construction home and the title company is the company picked by the builder (sometimes owned by the builder) to handle all their transactions.

In addition, if the home you are buying is a bank-owned home, then the title company is, in fact, working for the owner of the foreclosed property (whether that is a lender, servicer or insurer/investor). SO, when the title company said there was nothing they could do, what they meant was “There is nothing we can change UNLESS we get different instructions from our principal (the lender/servicer/insurer).

Did you make a mistake? I have to tell you that you did. It probably doesn’t make you feel a lot better to know that almost everyone makes the same mistake.

THE MISTAKE: Believing that because someone presented you with papers that you must sign them. You DO NOT have to sign them. No, you can not go ahead with the transaction unless you sign them, but that also means that the other people can’t get what they want either. If you insist that the papers have to be changed to what you were told before (especially if you have a good faith estimate which documents the amounts you should be paying) then there is a very strong chance that the lender will change their instructions to the title company, the papers will be changed accordingly and then all of you can re-convene in order to close the deal.

This is almost certainly not going to happen this afternoon. But it can happen. It is worth holding out for. It is worth making everyone else uncomfortable until you get the deal you were told you would be getting.

Is there anything you can do now? I doubt it because you signed all the papers. You used your most prized possession and endorsed yourself into a pickle. You can hold on to the lesson you learned, share it with others and promise yourself to never again sign documents which you don’t clearly understand or which do not correspond to the agreement with the other party.

JUST DON’T DO IT!

© Copyright 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved. "Answer Book in a Foreclosure Climate" by Mildred Wilkins, available in 2009 from www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

Q&A: Clear Chain of Title

Q: When selling their home, is the seller responsible for paying the back taxes or tax liens? I have always assumed that they would be.

A: Short answer: YES, to both. More accurate answer is: Depends on whether the seller is an individual or an entity.

Individual sellers of real estate are required to provide a clear chain of title and that requires that any back taxes or tax liens would have to be satisfied prior to or at the closing. In order to demonstrate that there are no outstanding debts against the property, the seller signs a vendor’s affidavit which affirms that there are no outstanding obligations which have not been paid. Additionally, they provide the purchaser with a general warranty deed further guaranteeing that a clear title has been conveyed.

Buyer Beware—Bank-owned sellers

The use of the word ‘their’ in the question above indicates you are talking about buying a home from an individual rather than an REO (bank-owned property) from an insurer such as HUD, VA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. While these insurers (as well as other guarantors) are required to pay back taxes and Federal tax liens before they transfer title, they are NOT required to cover all liens and consequently you will most often receive what is called a “special warranty deed”, “sheriff’s deed” or “trustee’s deed”. Irrespective of what it is called, any of these types of deeds will be transferring “marketable title” but not necessarily “clear title” to you. You owe it to yourself to get clarity on all the words highlighted in this section before you purchase a home which is being offered for sale by an institution rather than an individual.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Q&A: Can they Take my Second House?

Q: If I have two houses and I lose one, will they take the other one too?

A: The short answer is that the lender can not just “take” your second home.

The complete answer is that you still need to be concerned about protecting your second home from liability as well as protecting yourself from future liability related to the foreclosure on the first home.

Future Risk

If the lender does not receive enough from the sale of the home after they complete the foreclosure and sell it as a bank-owned property, many states will allow them to go into court and request a “deficiency judgment”. In order for them to receive such a judgment they will need only to demonstrate that you agreed to repay a certain amount for the home and they got less than that.

Let’s say $276,000 was your mortgage amount and they only got $213,000 from the eventual sale of the property. There is a loss of $63,000. In addition, the terms of your note or deed of trust will grant them permission to also ask to be reimbursed for attorney fees and other allowable costs, based on the terms of your mortgage document and your state’s foreclosure laws.

A crafty lender might end up changing a $63,000 shortage into a request for $89,000 as a deficiency judgment request. If you do not challenge this and a deficiency is granted, the lender/insurer then has the leverage to:

a. Use a wage assignment to garnish paychecks

b. Have judgment recorded on credit reports

c. Possibly intercept income tax refunds

d. Collect from anything you earn, marry, inherit

e. Attach judgment to any other real property you own, (second home) or later acquire

Having said all that, the short answer: they can’t TAKE the second home but they sure can make your life miserable. You are wise to consider the implications for a second home and need to seek legal advice to help you determine what is your next step to protect your investment in the second home, if that is possible. I’m betting that it is, but I am a writer, not an attorney. Yell for help. It’s attorney time.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

Q&A: Real Party of Interest

Q. I had been making payments for more than a year to Company X and fell behind on my mortgage payments by a couple of months. Today I got what looks like a foreclosure notice from a company I have never heard of before. The amount they say I owe is wrong and they are claiming that I have not made payments for the past 8 months. I don’t want to lose my home over some mistake but I can’t afford an attorney. Is there some way that I can figure out how to keep my home on my own?

A. There is a strong possibility that you may be able to block the foreclosure long enough to figure out what is going on. Your first step is to file an “answer” (see here) to all the correct parties.

Let’s cover some basics about the “real party of interest.” The real party of interest is the only entity or individual who can be the plaintiff in a lawsuit. Concerning your mortgage or deed of trust, the real party must either have purchased or otherwise have acquired legal ownership of the collateral in order to sue you as a plaintiff for non-payment of the debt. There is also a provision for a servicer who has been granted servicing rights “with assigns” to be the named plaintiff as well, since such a arrangement grants all rights to the holder as though they were the rightful owner. “Servicing rights only” does NOT grant one the power to sue for payment as a plaintiff in a foreclosure action.

In all cases, the named plaintiff should be able to provide documentation that they have the legal right to pursue you for payment. Send a qualified written request and demand that they provide such documentation. The documentation you need is a copy of the transfer of your note/deed of trust. Or proof that a transfer of servicing rights “with assigns” was made prior to the filing of the foreclosure. With so many lenders making transfers of files all the time, they have gotten really sloppy about these little details. Many times servicers are identified as plaintiffs in a foreclosure action when they have no legal right to do so. Challenge the validity of the action, not the truthfulness of your default. Additionally, dispute the amount declared to be in default and request documentation of all funds paid by you on the account.

Essentially I am saying that many foreclosures are processed and completed, folks lose their homes when the lawsuit was filed by someone who was not, in fact, the “real party of interest.” A consumer borrowed money from Bank X, who transferred the loan to Bank Y, who was then bought by Bank Z. Bank Z owned Bank Y, but your note is still held by Bank Y. Bank Z cannot legally be the plaintiff until there is a transfer of your SPECIFIC note to Bank Z.

It’s a simple concept once you think about it. Use an attorney if you don’t feel competent doing it yourself; but I think you could handle this yourself once you fully understand.

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved. "Answer Book in a Foreclosure Climate" by Mildred Wilkins, available in 2009 from www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

Myth #3

Myth #3: That bank-owned property is always free of any undisclosed liens or other encumbrances.

Reality: Many of the homes being purchased as REO or bank-owned properties are being transferred with liens already attached or the possibility of liens becoming attached.

Reason: The kind of title policy which is used for REO sales is a special, limited coverage policy. The holder of REO properties makes no warranties about possible clouds on the title prior to their acquisition through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu. Title is transferred using a special warranty deed or a sheriff’s deed and most importantly all the documents which the purchaser has signed states that they understand these facts.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)

Q&A: Highest and Best

I am sure that the person who submitted the question below will have made a decision before they have a chance to get my answer. In any case, the answer could be helpful to anyone who has or might write an offer on an REO property so I am including it on the website.

Q. My wife and I wrote an offer a week ago on a bank-owned house and today our agent told us that the bank has another offer in addition to ours and gave us an opportunity to change the offer if we want to and give them our ‘highest and best’ offer by 5 p.m. tomorrow. Is this common? How should we respond?

A. First, just as a point of clarity, we are talking about a fairly common practice when you are trying to purchase an REO (real estate owned) property. The process of purchasing such a property is significantly different. The guarantor or lender who is selling such a property is interested ONLY in the highest net dollar amount. One way to increase the net is to encourage competing buyers to make offers on the same property (creating a multiple offer situation). Once the agent who represents such a seller is holding more than one offer, the strategy is then to have them compete against each other which results in a higher amount being offered for the home.

This process has rules. All potential buyers should be given the same time frame to respond and either increase their offer amount or re-affirm the amount they offered before is, in fact, their ‘highest and best’ offer. This option should be provided to the buyer’s agent (via fax) and provide for a signature so that the buyer’s agent can confirm that they have received the notification that the buyer needs to respond by a specific time.

The time frame for response varies but it is not uncommon for it to be 24-48 hours. A buyer has the option of withdrawing their offer if they decide they do not wish to participate in the bidding war. A buyer who is still interested and wants to increase their bid should be certain that their agent gets their revised offer in prior to the expiration of the required time frame. A follow-up phone call would be appropriate since the seller is going to make a decision based on the offers they receive during the stated response time.

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

From the Desk of..."REALTOR at the Crossroads"

You’re a

REALTOR at the Crossroads

This is not a time for ‘dabbling’ in real estate. If you’re not a BIG DOG or prepared to become one, you really must stay on the porch. If you’re a little ‘soft around the edges’ and cry at scary movies, now would be a good time to non-renew your license.

Challenging Times

We are hard pressed to remember a time which has been harder for the housing market, and consequently, for real estate professionals in the past 25-30 years. If you are still trying to decide whether or not to renew your license, then read on. I have been warning that we were headed for just this situation since 2002. Mostly, I have been laughed at for my trouble or asked “Are you serious?” I was serious and correct. Everybody else is adequately covering the challenges now that we are actually in the midst of them. I have chosen always to understand my environment and figure a way to become at peace with it. So, let’s fast forward to the best of times.

Best of Times

This is the best of times to seize the opportunities being presented by today’s challenging real estate market. If you have lived a few years past, say, 30, you know that inherent in all difficulties lies the potential for new opportunities. This really is the best of times to take stock of both your personal and professional lives and decide—AGAIN—what you want to become when you grow up. While traditional real estate sales, for the average REALTOR, have become difficult at best, YOU are not average. You decided to read this article hoping to find insight and perhaps direction since you recognize you are at a crossroads.

Today’s Reality

No matter what city or state you happen to call home the challenges facing real estate professionals today are remarkably similar. There are more properties available for sale, a somewhat (or perhaps extreme) smaller pool of traditional buyers, tighter guidelines for financing, more REOS and a multiplicity of factors pushing property values down. Did I describe your market pretty accurately? There are exceptions, of course, but your market is likely described above. Today’s reality. Your success depends very little on what is going on in your market. Instead, your success is tied to how you respond to the market and whether or not you position yourself to be one of the agents who not only survives---but thrives—during this turbulent market. A concentrated, committed, full-time effort will almost guarantee success.

Specialization in Expanding Fields

The successful real estate professional two years from now will be able to look back and tell you with clarity exactly when they stood at the crossroads and made a choice which took their career to a new level. Specialization in one of those areas which are expanding because of the downturn will allow you to become one of those future success stories.

What Might a Career Shift Look Like?

• REO sales person—representing lenders/servicers by selling bank owned property. ( I am a former Fannie-Mae Broker specialist.) Can you imagine the volume of listings I would have now if I still represented them?
• Trash-out Specialist—handling all the details needed to trash-out and prep homes which have been foreclosed
• Locksmith—again—working for lenders to re-key when properties are vacated prior to foreclosure and again after the sheriff’s sale for placement on the open market as an REO
• Reverse Mortgage Specialist—working for a company which sells reverse mortgages to seniors who have equity in their homes as a way to avoid foreclosure/enhance their lives
• Foreclosure Intervention Specialist—(FIS)–starting a business as a consultant to offer foreclosure intervention counseling/representation, especially in upper end markets/areas
• Investor—in rental property you expect to hold for the duration of this down economy
• Property Manager—for single or multi-family—WARNING—not a simple as saying you can.
• Short Sale Specialist—again-not as simple as saying you can. Agents who have learned to be proficient at the strategies for successfully completing a short sale will be in demand. You would have more business than you could handle—IF YOU KNEW the secrets to successful short sales.
• Default Counselor—not the same as a foreclosure intervention specialist at all. You would most likely work for a non-profit agency doing counseling or you might start your own firm
• Real Estate Attorney–who decides to represent consumers who are struggling with their mortgage payments. You would also receive referrals from REALTORS, default counselors, and foreclosure intervention specialist when legal help was needed—WHICH IS CONTINUALLY.
• Lawn Care Company—not very glamorous---but definitely a business with a strong demand. As more foreclosures occur lenders are increasingly under the gun to keep properties which they own maintained. They’d rather pay you than the city.
• Show Home Franchisee Owner—finding qualified tenants for upper end properties while they remain listed. It’s a different class of property management. Great income—thriving in some markets.
• Property Valuation—using professional BPO forms ( such as the Fannie Mae BPO long form) and skills which include making adjustments for individual components of the property. Your most likely employer: lenders and servicers. Additionally, I believe consumers would be willing to pay for fairly accurate assessment of their property’s current resale value in order to help with their difficult choices in this climate. (I’m sorry guys, the traditional BPO or CMA is not thorough enough for today’s market.)

Dare to Re-Define Yourself

Trust me, time is on your side. The current wave will be rolling for the next 5-7 years or more. Get ready for the next ‘stage’ of your real estate career. Since I entered real estate in 1993, I have gone from buyer’s agent for entry level homes to listing agent to Fannie Mae Broker-Specialist to becoming a national trainer on foreclosure issues. Life is about ‘stages.’ Get un-stuck, buckle up and hang on!!.

You’re a REALTOR at a crossroads; which path meshes with your skills and interests?

Observations From the Desk of Mildred Wilkins,
President and Founder of Home Ownership Matters, LLC.

© Copyright 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights reserved.
(FIS) is a registered trademark of Home Ownership Matters, LLC.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

WORD: 'Pig in a Poke'

And the WORD for Today is:

“Pig in a Poke”—Buying a bank owned house can be much  like buying “a pig in a poke” (you don’t know if you got the runt until you get home and open the sack). You may be unfamiliar with this southern expression which means ‘you got took’. You not only got home and found you had the runt of the litter, he is malnourished as well. Gotta watch those sack purchases. 

All too often a buyer is so focused on negotiating the lowest price they can get without ascertaining the size/quality/condition of the item being purchased. Buying something as complex as a house without detailed information (including a thorough inspection) and substantial background information could end up totally negating any up-front savings you thought you had accomplished with long term, on-going expenses.

It is not a given that you will be ‘taken’, I am just saying the chances are high. “Buyer Beware.”

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

WORD: Winterization

And the WORD for Today is:

Winterization – of a vacant home is usually performed when a consumer abandons after going into default and becoming frustrated because they have not been able to complete any kind of workout plan with the lender. The lender in such a case will most likely secure (change locks) the property and have someone to use minimal precautions to avoid frozen pipes. If the property is bank owned then the servicer may take more detailed precautions such as having the water drained from the hot water heater and all the pipes blown out in order to assure there is no risk of frozen pipes within the walls.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased at www.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

WORD: Marketable Title

And the WORD for Today is...

Marketable Title – means a title that can be readily sold to a reasonably prudent purchaser aware of the facts and their legal meaning concerning liens and encumbrances. Marketable does not mean the same as CLEAR title. Many bank-owned properties are sold with the use of a marketable title (which is disclosed) but if the buyer does not understand the risks associated with such a purchase and does not conduct a title search there could be unpleasant consequences.

Marketable Title means a title which can be readily marketed but may not have all liens cleared. A buyer should therefore be aware of their legal rights and secure additional protection with a title policy which provides gap coverage.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

You can find more helpful definitions of WORDS like these in Your Real Estate Advisor which can be purchased atwww.DovePublishingHouse.com.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

WORD: Highest and Best Offer

And the WORD for Today Is...

“Highest and Best” Offer – is a term generally associated with the purchase of bank owned property. When more than one offer has been submitted to the guarantor/seller, the buyer’s agent may be asked to submit the buyer’s “highest and best” offer. They may choose to increase the offer in the hopes of being selected from multiple offers held by the lender, withdraw their offer altogether or hold steady at the amount and with terms previously submitted. Highest and best offers should always be written and the notification from the listing agent should clearly indicate the time frame for response.

Copyright © 2009, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(Please E-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments or concerns you might have! We appreciate all comments and feedback, so please don't be shy.)

REO Assumptions and Assertions

REO Assumptions and Assertions

Biggest Assumption: They just need to dump it

Translation: They’ll take any kind of crazy offer

Assertion: N-O-T YET

As a former Fannie Mae Broker–Specialist, I can provide insight into the real world of buying and selling bank-owned properties. First, forget most of what you think you know about such transactions—you’re probably way off target.

The Devil’s in the Details . . .

If you’re assuming they just need to dump it, you are half way right. They do, they really do, but not at any price. The most common misconception is that the holder of REO property will accept any offer without consideration for the value of the collateral. I suspect you’ve been watching too much late night television. While it is true that the increased volume of foreclosed properties means a substantial increase in REO inventory, the basic business principles which govern liquidation are not changing as rapidly as they need to (or as you had hoped they would.)

Harsh New Reality

It is a harsh new reality that today’s market is being flooded with REO’s. Thousands more will be added in the months ahead as a result of the backlog which has been created because of political posturing. As a consequence, both federal agencies (HUD, VA, Fannie and Freddie) and private mortgage insurance carriers will need to adjust their guidelines during the upcoming months. Unfortunately, as a practical matter, in the meantime, they and loan servicers must operate within the guidelines of existing regulations and existing contractual stipulations until they are amended. They will be relaxed—necessity will dictate that they must be. The consequence will be a ‘let’s make a deal free-for-all.’ Good for agents and buyers—not so good for price stabilization. But it has to happen and the sooner we get to it the better.

They Don’t Know Its Value

You’re right on target with that assertion. The “local market reality” is a piece of data which is hard for the servicer to grasp when they handle properties around the country from a centralized location. The truth is, their usual resources are less than reliable. They must rely on:

• Their appraisal, and we know how likely that is to be inflated
• A $50-$75 BPO—okay, does anyone really think you’re getting an accurate evaluation with a product produced in a BPO mill? Do you really think that they are trying to determine value with that document? (They are NOT. They are fulfilling a servicing requirement to have a BPO performed.)
• Their gut instinct
• The loan amount shown in their computer—but since when has that been connected to the ACTUAL value of the property?

Hence, the market will dictate and that process takes time. If the property is ‘rejected by the market’ for an extended period of time then it is declining in both actual and perceived value. It’s in everyone’s best interest to determine fairly accurately, from the onset, what is today’s market value. Consequently, the servicer needs a current, as-is appraisal. While many appraisers were rewarded for inflating values during the boom years, they are now stuck with the unpleasant task of trying to justify vast differences between former and current value. Market correction is not enough of an explanation but the recently sold comps don’t lie. It’s worth what someone will pay for it—today—not last year.

The Law of Supply and Demand

In time (I think within the next three to four months) the inventory will be so high that the valuations will plummet and get in line with what a ready and able buyer is willing to pay a reluctant REO owner. During the boom years hundreds of thousands of houses were built across the country without any clear need based on population growth. Speculation in real estate was HOT. The jobs created, the loans generated, and false illusion of prosperity made for wonderful headlines.

I was nearly thrown out of a Foreclosure Task Force meeting in Indiana in 2006 when I dared to mention the need for a moratorium on new construction since the city had already built more than 30,000 new homes in 5 years for only 10,000 new residents. I mentioned a college business class on supply and demand. I visited Denver in 2006 and thought they were building homes for the entire United States to move there. Then I moved to Florida and quickly observed that enough new houses were being built there for the few folks who didn’t want to move to Denver or Indianapolis. Shall I mention Atlanta, Las Vegas and twenty other cities which issued building permits without checking to see where the buyers were coming from. We are paying the piper (and we will be paying for the next ten years) for allowing an excessive amount of housing to be built. We created an economic situation which will dictate FEWER aggregate occupied households as people move to sharing homes in order to survive the financial crisis created, in part, by the ‘creative financing’ used to sell the new housing stock.

In time, the newly created rental housing market (previous homeowners, now renting again) will absorb much of the current excess single family housing but we will have changed the dynamics of communities across the countries from single family, owner-occupant to rental dwellings, perhaps housing more than one family. Investors are the most likely purchasers for the glut of foreclosed homes which will hit the market during the next two years. As businessmen and women, they will make decisions based on totally different criteria than buyers who would be owner-occupants. Financial institutions will have no choice except to reconsider their options when holding costs, fines from municipalities and other constraints dictate they do something to stop the bleeding. Excess has its payback. The law of supply and demand will not be ignored; pretending it does not exist is a sure fire way to pay the piper.

Now About that Insurance and Title Work

If you do not know the difference between a ‘marketable title’ and a ‘clear title’ this would be an excellent thing for you to research if you are planning to purchase an REO property. Suffice it to say that the REO you are purchasing can have gaps in the title coverage which leave room for undisclosed liens to surface after the closing and bite the new owner in the proverbial behind. Since you will have signed numerous documents which stated that you understood that you had no recourse after closing: you will not be surprised when I tell you: YOU HAVE NO RECOURSE AFTER CLOSING.

Watch for an upcoming webinar on the HOM website: “Buying REO is Risky Business”. You might want to put that on your schedule.

Copyright © 2008, Home Ownership Matters, LLC. All rights Reserved.

(Please e-mail Heather at homeownershipmatters@gmail.com with any questions, comments, or concerns you might have. We appreciate all feedback, comments, and especially your questions. Don't be shy!)